Hacking Exposed Computer Forensics Blog: Daily Blog #26 ...

Hi Reader,

? ? ? ? ? When I finished the milestone series I asked that those of you who have hit milestone 14 in your career to email me. Eric Zimmerman was the first brave soul to do so and was willing to be interviewed for the blog on his career, his forensic interests and his views. I think he brought some great answers back and I hope you enjoy his insights. If you have reached milestone 14 and are hesitating until this point to email me at dcowen@g-cpartners.com for an interview, then read this to see what I'm interested in. I don't want to put your investigations, case or research at risk, I want to help others see how you got started and how you got to milestone 14 so they can do the same!

? ? If you are reading this before noon central on friday 7/19/13 then please come join us for our first forensic lunch where we will talk about the tri-force, our usn research, shadowkit and your questions:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/events/cedl2na1nqhvomfful00sad9teo

With that said, here is the interview with Special Agent Eric Zimmerman.

EZ: First of all i would like to thank you for the interview opportunity.?I like the way you defined the milestones and it serves as a great?barometer for people to use in their careers. My progression thru the?milestones and optional achievements wasn't linear, but i suspect that's?the case with most people.

DC: ?How did you get started in computer forensics?

EZ: I got started in forensics years ago as a byproduct of being a computer?geek, but i didn't get serious about it until i became an agent and?started needing digital forensics in my day to day work. I've been using?hex editors for years for a variety of things and started using WinHex?about 4 years ago for some case work. I got my EnCE about two years ago?using Encase 6. Soon after i fully transitioned to X-Ways Forensics. i?have been fortunate enough to work violations where essentially?everything involves a computer, so there was ample opportunity to learn?and gain experience.

DC: What event in your career propelled you forward the most?

EZ:?I would say the biggest benefit to my career was being the case agent?and primary forensic examiner in a very technical case involving p2p?networks and encryption. In addition to the trial itself, I went through?a Daubert hearing and was qualified as an expert in federal court. I?wrote hundreds of pages of reports for a wide variety of audiences.?Being able to articulate information to people in a way they can relate?to is a critical skill. it is not enough to be an expert in digital?forensics. you have to be able to convey your findings in a meaningful?way to the consumer of that information. Events like a big trial or?similar is where you get to finally use all the skills and knowledge?you've built up and practiced over the years.
Another major event was winning the 2011 NCMEC award for my work in?combating the online sexual exploitation of children. In 2011, my?software led to the rescue of at least 45 children, the execution of 330?search warrants, and 222 arrests. To date my software is in use by at?least 4000 people in 52 countries.

DC: ?Do you remember what lighted your passion for computer forensics, what pushed you forward to Milestone 14?

EZ: My passion began with wanting to understand the underlying technology?behind computers. Once you start peeling back the layers you begin to?get an understanding of how deep the rabbit hole goes. I tend to get?bored easily so having such a wide variety of things to learn keeps it?interesting. There is always something new to learn and even more to?discover for the first time.
As for what pushed me toward milestone 14, necessity was the biggest?thing. After you see the fruits of solving a new problem or reversing a?previously unknown artifact you start to see the potential in looking?into the unknown. I do not have the ability to do pure research as much?as i would like to, so most of my milestone 14 stuff revolves around?either my own or my colleagues cases. as new problems come up i work to?solve them.
Beyond necessity was wanting to figure out something that was previously?unknown. It was a challenge to solve a "puzzle" from scratch with?nothing more than some network captures, binary files, a hex editor and?some programming skill. A lot of my work involved reverse engineering?proprietary, closed source protocols (sorry i cant be more specific than?that) and when i started looking into it very little was understood?about the protocols and other artifacts. I wrote some cool custom?software to assist with things as needed.
Passion for the work is really critical, almost more so than one's?technical ability, because without it you may not have the stamina to?follow through to the end. Frustration is inevitable but you just have?to keep your head down and move the ball forward. Working with a team of?people is also very helpful.

DC: What is your favorite forensic artifact?

EZ:?In general, the registry, but as to a specific artifact it would be?ShellBags by far. It is amazing how much detail is maintained in?ShellBags. i have used them to show what was inside encrypted TrueCrypt?containers in order to prove intent as well as corroborate other?artifacts. in the case of encryption, it basically serves as a means to?see the file names, time stamps and file sizes of things inside a?container. If you can then tie that information to more concrete?artifacts involving file hashes (and therefore the file size) you can?peer inside the encryption and say with certainty what is in there.

DC: What are you researching now?

EZ:?When i get a break from my cases, my primary focus is continuing to?expand the abilities of my live response software, osTriage. Version 1?is for law enforcement/government only but with version 2 i want it to?be available to a wider audience. My approach for version 2 is to use?plugins to provide functionality vs. a monolithic executable as I did?with version 1.
By making the programming interfaces available to anyone, people can?write plugins that are meaningful to them in case their particular issue?isn't included out of the box. plugin authors can choose to share their?work or keep it in-house. I've written the main program in such a way?that it works with the interfaces to automatically generate reports,bookmark items of interest, copy files from computers, etc. This lets?plugin authors focus on new features and not basic plumbing.
In version 2, I have spent a lot of time focusing on performance and?have seen some fantastic gains in speed. For example, my new code can?iterate every file and directory on a 256GB hard drive (with over?276,000 files and 59,000 directories) in about 22 seconds whereas the?version 1 took over 8 minutes to do the same search. that 22 seconds?includes finding pictures, hashing them, and generating thumbnails,exploring archive files, parsing .lnk files, and pulling dozens of pieces?of live response data. I demonstrated this at the 2013 Boston Cyber?Conference earlier this year in my talk on the need for improved triage?techniques.

DC: What inspired you to write a book?

EZ: The inspiration for the book was to be able to unpack the X-Ways?manual into a format that more people would be able to relate to based?on their existing knowledge in forensics. Our goal wasn't to teach?forensics, but rather to explain X-Ways.
The X-Ways manual is a fine piece of technical writing, but few people?have the patience or time to penetrate its depths. I really think X-Ways?is at the top of the pyramid when it comes to forensic suites but in?some circles it has the reputation of being hard to use. Where people?can run into trouble is there are a lot of ways to accomplish a goal in?X-Ways rather than one linear path as found in other tools.
X-Ways puts incredible power in the hands of the forensic examiner and?lets them wield that power in a way that makes sense to them and the?case at hand. Once people try X-Ways and get comfortable with it they?rarely go back to other tools. I found the best way to jump in was to?work a case in X-Ways Forensics solo or in parallel with an existing tool.
With the book in hand you can begin the transition from other tools to?X-Ways in a straightforward manner. The book is written in such a way to?walk people through its use from initial installation, hard drive?imaging, reporting and everything in between.

DC: Where can we buy the book?

EZ: The book is titled "X-Ways Forensics Practitioner's Guide" and is?currently available for pre-order at Amazon (http://goo.gl/vWmqa) as well?as Barnes and Noble (http://goo.gl/DIJO6). We recently sent our final?proofs back to the publisher well ahead of schedule and hope to see the?book shipping in August. we have more information as well as software?programs I wrote for the book at?http://xwaysforensics.wordpress.com/.

DC: What is next for your career? What is beyond Milestone 14 for you?

EZ:??I would like to continue to expand the capabilities of firstresponders and raise the bar when it comes to triage as it relates to?what we can cull from computers. I have been focusing on trying to?define what the needs of the majority of people are when it comes to?digital evidence (at least as it relates to law enforcement). My?ultimate goal is to be able to deliver 90% of the relevant information?for a case in 10 minutes or so.
For me, moving beyond milestone 14 involves thinking at a more strategic?level vs. the day to day existence in the trenches. This involves?defining and polishing best practices for colleagues and peers and?automating common tasks to act as a force multiplier for understaffed or?smaller departments.

DC: What are your favorite tools?

EZ:?My favorite tools include X-Ways Forensics (of course) and WinHex,?CommView, Wireshark, Edit Pad Pro, RegRipper, F-Response, Directory Opus(Explorer replacement), Visual Studio, Sysinternals stuff, Volatility,?and who can forget the Tri-force! The amount of high quality software?out there amazes me. there are many gifted developers and digital?forensics people out there who put a ton of time into great tools. Some?even choose to give their work away. Thanks to all the devs out there!?Much of what we can do in digital forensics would not be possible?without your contributions.

DC: What do you believe is the greatest challenge facing forensic examiners?

EZ:?The ability to separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to?digital evidence. related to this is a continued reliance on outdated?workflows when it comes to processing data. I wont mention any names but?there are a lot of solutions out there that require a massive amount of?up front processing before an exam can start. Combine this with a lack?of checkpointing and you have a recipe for pain when things crash.
Storage capacities continue to increase exponentially while our ability?to examine that data is only increasing mathematically. it doesn't take?long to realize we have to get smarter in how we look at data or the?lead times for a full forensics review will continue to get longer and?longer. In my estimation, the answer (or at least a partial answer) to?this problem is better triage techniques. If we can identify the?computers and digital devices that are relevant to us we can focus our?efforts on those devices vs the "examine everything" approach most often?employed now. We have to find the balance between thoroughness and?timeliness in our examinations. Its a tough problem for sure, but one i?think the community can solve.

Thanks Eric for the interview, I hope everyone gets something out of it. Tomorrow is Saturday reading and I have some interesting links to share. The big event though is this coming Sunday Funday where we have a prize provided by Magnet Forensics that I think you will want to win!?

Source: http://hackingexposedcomputerforensicsblog.blogspot.com/2013/07/daily-blog-26-interview-with-sa-eric.html

biggest loser TJ Lane lindsey vonn lindsey vonn nit first day of spring Club Penguin